Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a great alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is really a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it normally as you want and never have to prepare the ice cream each time. It’s great for kids and for parties because you can serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert that allows you to put it into the mouth area, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you may go. If the product also has an extinguisher it is also in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. Along with sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco in to the marketplace.
As well as the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes available could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to the younger generations, this could substantially decrease the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government could have a point. There’s currently no requirement of tobacco companies to add warning labels on their products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have as a common factor is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It podsmall.com appears to be a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem just like a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which in turn means that fewer people will purchase them.